Sunday 16 August 2015

B777 cockpit starved of Oxygen

British Airways flight forced to make emergency landing after 'cockpit starved of air'

Two pilots flying a Boeing 777 from London to Seattle were forced to make an emergency landing because their cockpit was starved of air, according to an official report.
plane
The cockpit of the Boeing 777 became starved of air during flight Credit: PA
All three crew members on the flight deck reported feeling unwell and were forced to wear oxygen masks for the remainder of the flight.
They also had to keep the door between the cockpit and passenger cabin open- contravening flight safety and security rules.
The report, by the Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB) concluded that the air supply had been blocked by debris including wire and bubble wrap in a ventilation duct below the cockpit floor.
plane
The plane was forced to turn back and make an emergency landing at Heathrow Credit: PA
The incident took place on 6 March with pilots saying they noted during take-off and climbing that there was "very low airflow".
The report says "The symptoms included headache, nausea, light-headedness, a constant urge to take deep breaths and difficulty maintaining concentration."
They were also concerned that the increased heat might affect electronics in the cockpit.
The decision to turn back to Heathrow was made as the plane was over Scotland.
The AAIB said there had been reports of a similar issue with other Boeing 777s but that such incidents were rare.

Friday 14 August 2015

Toxic incident on BA AGAIN!!!!

British Airways pilots were forced to wear oxygen masks for emergency landing after 'debris blocking air to flight deck' made them ill

  • British Airways flight was en-route to Seattle, U.S. from London Heathrow
  • But an hour into the journey three pilots in the cockpit fell ill at controls
  • The cockpit door was opened for 20 minutes to increase air flow
  • All three crew forced to deploy oxygen masks as plane landed in London
  • Poor air flow had been reported on two earlier occasions on the plane 
Pilots on a US-bound British Airways flight carrying 221 passengers fell ill at 10,000ft and were forced to make an emergency landing due to a block in the air conditioning that left them needing their oxygen masks. 
A report by the Air Accidents Investigation Branch has highlighted worrying factors that led to the Seattle-bound plane turning back to London an hour into the journey.
The air vents into the cockpit were found to have been blocked by debris, consisting of wire, bubble wrap and insulation material. The three pilots began suffering headaches, nausea and light-headedness so they deployed their oxygen masks and declared an emergency.
Scroll down for video 
A British Airways flight from London to the U.S. was forced to make an emergency landing after the pilots became ill in the cockpit (file photo)
A British Airways flight from London to the U.S. was forced to make an emergency landing after the pilots became ill in the cockpit (file photo)
The blackened and brittle appearance of the debris suggested it had 'been there for some time.'
Also, it was revealed the crew were forced to fly with the cockpit door open to improve air circulation. Since the terror attacks of 9/11 the cockpit door is required to be locked at all times.
There were 221 passengers on board the Boeing 777, with a total of 14 crew. 
'As the flight reached initial cruise level, all three crew members on the flight deck started to feel unwell and opened the cockpit door to improve ventilation,' the report states. 
'The decision was made to return to Heathrow with all three crew members on oxygen and the cockpit door closed. 
'It was found that debris in the conditioned air duct below the cockpit floor was almost completely blocking airflow to the flight deck.'
The pilot remained at the controls as the two co-pilots opened the cockpit door and went into the cabin to test the ventilation (file photo)
The pilot remained at the controls as the two co-pilots opened the cockpit door and went into the cabin to test the ventilation (file photo)

EU RULES ON AIRCRAFT COCKPITS 

On 27 March 2015, the European Air Safety Agency (EASA) has issued a recommendation for airlines to observe the 'four-eye-rule' in the cockpit; stipulating that in the case of the Captain or First Officer leaving the cockpit, a member of the crew should be present in the cockpit with the remaining pilot.
European safety regulations require that pilots remain at the aircraft controls unless absence is necessary for physiological or operational safety needs.
There is no European requirement that a member of the cabin crew must enter the cockpit when a pilot needs to take a short break for such needs. There is however a requirement that the cockpit door can be opened from the outside in case of emergency.
Since the terror attacks of 9/11, regulations came into place to re-inforce the cockpit door, and to ensure pilots kept it locked at all times through the flight.
The Germanwings disaster where co-pilot Andreas Lubitz deliberately crashed an Airbus A320 into a mountain in the Alps, killing all 150 people on board has seen many question as to how the rules on the cockpit door should be out into practice. 
Lubitz had locked the pilot out and seized sole control of the plane. 
The lack of ventilation was noticed on take-off, but as things didn't improve, the pilots began to feel unwell.
The symptoms included headache, nausea, light-headedness, a constant urge to take deep breaths and difficulty maintaining concentration.
The two co-pilots went out into the cabin where the temperature and air flow was normal. The decision was then taken to open the cockpit door to allow a flow of air.
As well as the belief that this would improve their health, there were concerns that a consistent air flow was required to ensure the controls didn't heat up and malfunction.  
The report adds: 'The forward toilet was withdrawn from passenger use and the curtains drawn to prevent the passengers from seeing that the cockpit door was open.' 
The decision to turn back to London was taken when the plane was just north of Glasgow. For the descent and landing, all three pilots donned their oxygen masks and their conditions improved.
The plane then dumped fuel over the Irish sea.
'The pilot believes the flight deck door had been open for a maximum of 15 to 20 minutes,' states the report.'
Worryingly, poor air flow into the cockpit had been reported on the same plane back on February 18 this year.
Despite the ducts been cleaned, the problem was again reported on February 28, with crew reporting that 'all puncalouvres valve in F/D have minimal airflow.'
A spokesperson for British Airways told MailOnline Travel: 'The safety of our customers and crew is always our priority and actions have been taken to help prevent this situation from recurring. 
'Our highly trained pilots took the decision to put on oxygen masks and return the aircraft to Heathrow after they noticed a fault, where the plane landed normally. 
'Our cabin crew looked after customers and we arranged an alternative aircraft so that they could continue their journey.' 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-3197506/British-Airways-pilots-forced-emergency-landing-wearing-oxygen-masks-falling-ill-controls-debris-blocking-airflow-flight-deck.html#ixzz3iod1Bvbo
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Toxic incident on BA AGAIN!!!!

British Airways pilots were forced to wear oxygen masks for emergency landing after 'debris blocking air to flight deck' made them ill

  • British Airways flight was en-route to Seattle, U.S. from London Heathrow
  • But an hour into the journey three pilots in the cockpit fell ill at controls
  • The cockpit door was opened for 20 minutes to increase air flow
  • All three crew forced to deploy oxygen masks as plane landed in London
  • Poor air flow had been reported on two earlier occasions on the plane 
Pilots on a US-bound British Airways flight carrying 221 passengers fell ill at 10,000ft and were forced to make an emergency landing due to a block in the air conditioning that left them needing their oxygen masks. 
A report by the Air Accidents Investigation Branch has highlighted worrying factors that led to the Seattle-bound plane turning back to London an hour into the journey.
The air vents into the cockpit were found to have been blocked by debris, consisting of wire, bubble wrap and insulation material. The three pilots began suffering headaches, nausea and light-headedness so they deployed their oxygen masks and declared an emergency.
Scroll down for video 
A British Airways flight from London to the U.S. was forced to make an emergency landing after the pilots became ill in the cockpit (file photo)
A British Airways flight from London to the U.S. was forced to make an emergency landing after the pilots became ill in the cockpit (file photo)
The blackened and brittle appearance of the debris suggested it had 'been there for some time.'
Also, it was revealed the crew were forced to fly with the cockpit door open to improve air circulation. Since the terror attacks of 9/11 the cockpit door is required to be locked at all times.
There were 221 passengers on board the Boeing 777, with a total of 14 crew. 
'As the flight reached initial cruise level, all three crew members on the flight deck started to feel unwell and opened the cockpit door to improve ventilation,' the report states. 
'The decision was made to return to Heathrow with all three crew members on oxygen and the cockpit door closed. 
'It was found that debris in the conditioned air duct below the cockpit floor was almost completely blocking airflow to the flight deck.'
The pilot remained at the controls as the two co-pilots opened the cockpit door and went into the cabin to test the ventilation (file photo)
The pilot remained at the controls as the two co-pilots opened the cockpit door and went into the cabin to test the ventilation (file photo)

EU RULES ON AIRCRAFT COCKPITS 

On 27 March 2015, the European Air Safety Agency (EASA) has issued a recommendation for airlines to observe the 'four-eye-rule' in the cockpit; stipulating that in the case of the Captain or First Officer leaving the cockpit, a member of the crew should be present in the cockpit with the remaining pilot.
European safety regulations require that pilots remain at the aircraft controls unless absence is necessary for physiological or operational safety needs.
There is no European requirement that a member of the cabin crew must enter the cockpit when a pilot needs to take a short break for such needs. There is however a requirement that the cockpit door can be opened from the outside in case of emergency.
Since the terror attacks of 9/11, regulations came into place to re-inforce the cockpit door, and to ensure pilots kept it locked at all times through the flight.
The Germanwings disaster where co-pilot Andreas Lubitz deliberately crashed an Airbus A320 into a mountain in the Alps, killing all 150 people on board has seen many question as to how the rules on the cockpit door should be out into practice. 
Lubitz had locked the pilot out and seized sole control of the plane. 
The lack of ventilation was noticed on take-off, but as things didn't improve, the pilots began to feel unwell.
The symptoms included headache, nausea, light-headedness, a constant urge to take deep breaths and difficulty maintaining concentration.
The two co-pilots went out into the cabin where the temperature and air flow was normal. The decision was then taken to open the cockpit door to allow a flow of air.
As well as the belief that this would improve their health, there were concerns that a consistent air flow was required to ensure the controls didn't heat up and malfunction.  
The report adds: 'The forward toilet was withdrawn from passenger use and the curtains drawn to prevent the passengers from seeing that the cockpit door was open.' 
The decision to turn back to London was taken when the plane was just north of Glasgow. For the descent and landing, all three pilots donned their oxygen masks and their conditions improved.
The plane then dumped fuel over the Irish sea.
'The pilot believes the flight deck door had been open for a maximum of 15 to 20 minutes,' states the report.'
Worryingly, poor air flow into the cockpit had been reported on the same plane back on February 18 this year.
Despite the ducts been cleaned, the problem was again reported on February 28, with crew reporting that 'all puncalouvres valve in F/D have minimal airflow.'
A spokesperson for British Airways told MailOnline Travel: 'The safety of our customers and crew is always our priority and actions have been taken to help prevent this situation from recurring. 
'Our highly trained pilots took the decision to put on oxygen masks and return the aircraft to Heathrow after they noticed a fault, where the plane landed normally. 
'Our cabin crew looked after customers and we arranged an alternative aircraft so that they could continue their journey.' 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-3197506/British-Airways-pilots-forced-emergency-landing-wearing-oxygen-masks-falling-ill-controls-debris-blocking-airflow-flight-deck.html#ixzz3iod1Bvbo
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Tuesday 4 August 2015

BA POOR CREW AT GATWICK












LGW - A GLIMPSE OF THE FUTURE?

02nd August 2015


Whilst the Eurofleet review was being undertaken and with much less of a fan fare or indeed consultation, British Airways quietly set in motion plans to make significant and potentially far wider reaching changes at London Gatwick. Current crew numbers at LGW are over 1400 crew, of which over 1000 are now Unite members.

It was announced earlier this year that the BA Gatwick fleet would move towards the introduction of a single supervisory grade. In other words the current roles of Purser and Cabin Manager would be ended and replaced by a Mixed Fleet style CSM role, with only one supervisor per aircraft on both worldwide and short haul flights. Crew complements would be made up of main crew and one CSM.

So what does this mean in reality?

There are currently around 360 CMs and Pursers at LGW. With only 1 senior crew member now required per flight under these proposals, only 240 SCCMs will be needed. For the 240 (combine CMs and Pursers) that remain, the change is intended to be significant. The current Cabin Manager contractual responsibility payment of £5,473 per year will instead be replaced by up to £2,500 per year, paid as “performance related” pay.  The exact amount each will receive will be decided every 3 months based on individual performance and on the whim of your particular manager; A run of bad flights, sickness or other `yet to be determined’ criteria, and it could end up being zero.

People affected have very limited options. For Cabin managers this will mean an initial £5,473 guaranteed pay cut, however could mean up to £9000 per year could be lost when a further cut in basic salary is taken into account. The new role basic salary scale is being capped at £24,015 - (for some perspective, this is the same level of pay as the current post `97 main-crew pay scale at LHR).  

Anyone wishing to move to Mixed Fleet as CSM as ‘suitable alternative employment’ has to apply and be subjected to the full selection process, with many already rejected. Standard severance has been offered, and an option to revert to Main crew but on Gatwick main crew salary with an even greater cut in salary.

That this is being carried out against a backdrop of rising profitability begs the question, is this the shape of things to come?

With the precarious state of the CSD role on Eurofleet and a long-standing CSL surplus on Worldwide, one does not need a crystal ball to deduce that it is more than a possibility. Five years ago BASSA forewarned that the future would look not too dissimilar and we took strike action to try and defend your livelihoods. Many listened but an equal number did not. All bar the LGW reps and a handful of members at Gatwick viewed the dispute as a “Heathrow” issue. It wasn't. It was a “cabin crew” issue.

Unite’s Gatwick Union have asked us to share the communication to their members and is posted below for your reference.


TO ALL LGW MEMBERS


The company has today shared their intention to impose their plans on 1st November 2015 with further changes to their final proposal.

Removal of the option to return to main crew for all wishing to.

No guarantee of VR for all who preference it.

Your only guaranteed option is a contractual change on to the imposed new pay scale. 

The CM uplift of £5,473 p.a. will cease with immediate effect on 1st November 2015. 

The Cabin Manager and Purser roles will cease. There will be no further recruitment in to these roles.

ALL current SCCMs placed in to the proposed CSM role will be subject to performance related pay at a maximum average of £2,500p.a gauged individually against standards yet to be determined.

The proposed new basic pay scale will have 5 increments and be capped at £24,015 p.a. Anyone above this level of pay will have their basic salary reduced to this sum. BA intend to mis-use the Redeployment Agreement to step reduce pay for these crew. 

The Company is proposing a one-off payment of £6000 to all CMs ON CONDITION that they sign a binding agreement to relinquish ALL individual rights to making legal claims in respect of these imposed changes and their loses. 

These proposals represent a 20-28% cut in guaranteed pay to crew in the senior grade. It is also a significant cut to pay for Pursers who work-up as CM under current agreements.

ALL main crew seeking future promotion, including current secondee Pursers will be forced on to 2010 contacts, terms and conditions, and will be managed under the `Our Colleague Guide’. The new pay scale for these crew will have 5 increments, starting at £17,215 and will be capped at £22,000 p.a.

To date, we have communicated facts and information to you without attempting to influence your view of the Company’s proposals. We have spent many hours seeking ways to reach acceptable solutions to the challenges we all now face. The Company has given only notional consideration to our responses and dismissed the rights and concerns we have raised in relation to the impact their proposal has upon our members. Your view will be essential to determine the way forward.

We have again reiterated that we do not believe this to be a genuine redundancy situation, and to impose changes is a clear breach of the 2011 Settlement Agreement between Unite the Union and British Airways.

We have today registered a Failure to Agree and the matter is referred to our Unite National Officer and the BA Forum. During this process, the status quo must remain.

We shall be in contact again with any and all updates.